Thursday, September 27, 2007

Book Launch Party in Second Life

Flashpoint by Frank Creed launches September 29. The book is published by The Writers' Cafe Press. Flashpoint is a Christian Cyber-punk novel and is Book One of the Underground series. You can read Donna Sundblad's review of Flashpoint here.

We will be helping with the book launch party in Second Life, a virtual world which is attracting a lot of attention. You will need to sign up at Second Life and download the software.

Once you download and install the free software, log in and design your avatar. Then on September 29 at 7 p.m. Second Life Time (Pacific Time) you can "teleport" directly to the Writing and Performance Center in Second Life by pasting this URL into your web browser:

http://slurl.com/secondlife/Eduisland%204/238/83/25

Monday, September 24, 2007

New Issue of Wayfarers Journal Online Now!

Perhaps you only receive these blog posts through the RSS feed, if so, you may not know that Wayfarers Journal is an ezine of spirituality based science fiction. We just updated the site with all new stories and poems. So, if you have not done so already, drop by today at http://www.wayfarersjournal.com

Thanks.

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

The Return: "I don't like Science Fiction"

As I have been reading reviews of The Return I noticed a theme emerging. A lot of people said, "I don't like science-fiction, but I like The Return." I have to admit that Austin Boyd has done a remarkable job of spinning a good story of suspenseful intrigue set against the background of such "science fiction" elements as cloning and space exploration. However, I think the comments have as much to do with the conception many people have of science fiction.

Most people today think of science fiction only in terms of space opera. By that I mean stories like those found in Star Wars and Star Trek (Although Roddenberry did a good job of elevating the series' above that of pure space opera.) Personally, I enjoy a good rousing space opera, but that's not all there is to science fiction.

Print science fiction, more than that of cinema or television, tends to transcend the action-adventure stereotype of the genre. Boyd's book is in that tradition. It is more thoughtful than the shoot-em-up stories that have come to dominate the genre. In this regard he is preserving the traditions of classic authors such as Assimov, Clarke, Heinlein, and Bradbury.

Kudos to Austin Boyd for writing a story with cross-over potential.

The Return: Down to Earth Science Fiction

The Return by Austin Boyd draws you into an exciting, adventurous world of intrigue without sacrificing believability. Reminiscent of some of the better writings of Arthur C. Clarke, Boyd keeps the science fiction rooted in the constraints of known science. Set only a few years in the future, the story revolves around John Wells. Wells, who believes his family has been killed, leads a mission to Mars, only to discover that they were not alone on the Red Planet. The "Martians" they discover are members of a secret colony planted on Mars by a wealthy industrialist. The colonists are followers of a charismatic cult leader, Malcolm Raines, who plans on saving the earth by cloning perfect individuals. The colony lives in near ideal (if you can call living on a lifeless planet in a tin can ideal) circumstances tempting the NASA team to simply join up and remain on Mars.

As I said in my previous post, if you like The X-Files, you'll find this an intriguing read. You have it all: intrigue, suspense, cults, cloning, conspiracies. This is intelligent science-fiction. If you are looking for action-adventure, firefights in every chapter or burly space jockeys punching it out, look elsewhere. This book challenges you to think.

The strength of the book lies in its roots in the real world. Boyd's experience as a spacecraft engineer brings authenticity to the science which lays the foundation for science fiction. The spacecraft and Martian habitats described do not depend on some sort of imaginary future technology. They could be built today. This gives the story a sense of immediacy often lost in the more Whiz-bang styles of science fiction.

Even his treatment of cloning, which is frequently distorted by science fiction authors, avoids the hysterical or the fantastical. He doesn't treat the clone as some evil, soulless entity, but rather as sympathetic victims of a religious fanatic.

The plot is intricate with frequent shifts of focus from Mars to Slovenia to Washington D.C. This can be confusing if you don't read carefully. It didn't bother me, but a casual reader might become confused. This is a book which requires the reader to be engaged throughout the book to keep track of the storyline. Personally, I like that. However, if you prefer to let a story flow over you, without engaging with the story yourself, this might not be the book for you.

The main weakness I saw was the lack of depth in many of the characters. The characters generally seemed to be vehicles for the story to be told. In other words, there was this great plot and you need to populate the plot with the people. That's how it felt when reading. We don't get a feel for the motivations of the individuals we just see what they do. The realism of the plot and setting does not always extend to the characters. For instance, conversions of attitude are often much swifter and quickly made than in real life. When a revelation shaking the underlying foundation of the followers of The Father Race on Mars is revealed, they tend to accept it repentantly without much trouble. Even if one is a willing participant in a "holy hoax" they will usually continue to defend it, if they are true believers. Here are several people who have committed themselves to the extent of exiling themselves from the Earth as part of a religious belief. It is unlikely that one revelation would undo that belief. They would probably even defend the hoax on the basis of serving the greater good, as Jerry Falwell did when caught spreading untrue rumors about President Jimmy Carter. We are very good at excusing bad behavior in the pursuit of a good cause.

Even given the lack of depth in the characters, this is a good story and a worthwhile read.

You can also read other reviews and comments from these blog tour participants:



Trish Anderson
Brandon Barr
Jim Black
Justin Boyer
Grace Bridges
Amy Browning
Jackie Castle
Valerie Comer
Karri Compton
Lisa Cromwell
CSFF Blog Tour
Gene Curtis
D. G. D. Davidson
Janey DeMeo
Merrie Destefano or Alien Dream
Jeff Draper
April Erwin
Linda Gilmore
Beth Goddard
Marcus Goodyear
Jill Hart
Katie Hart
Sherrie Hibbs
Christopher Hopper
Becca Johnson
Jason Joyner
Kait
Karen
Dawn King
Tina Kulesa
Rachel Marks
Karen McSpadden
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Eve Nielsen
John W. Otte
Lyn Perry
Deena Peterson
Rachelle
Cheryl Russel
Chawna Schroeder
Mirtika Schultz
James Somers
Steve Trower
Speculative Faith
Laura Williams
Timothy Wise

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

The Return: Concerning Aliens and Assumptions


If you were a fan of The X-Files, you should like The Return
by Austin Boyd with its conspiracies, clones and cults. I'm still finishing the book today, so I will post a review of the work tomorrow. However, I would like to use this column to address a question of interest to Christian Science Fiction writers and readers. That question is: "What about Aliens?" In Boyd's novel the assumption is that the Biblical answer is that they do not exist. The only "aliens" that are seen are fake ones and, unlike the venerable X-Files assumption the government is hiding the evidence that aliens do NOT exist. I find that to be a nice twist on the classic conspiracy theory. One Christian in the book is told to (and this is a paraphrase) "Take your nose out of your Bible" and realize that aliens do exist.

However, is that really the Biblical answer? Honestly, to argue that Biblical Christianity requires non-belief in extraterrestrial life is not justified. Having said that, though, arguing for extraterrestrial life based on scripture alone is equally unjustified. Personally, I feel (compared to having absolute knowledge) that extraterrestrial life is likely. Considering that God populated his own universe with angels, seraphim and cherubim along with creatures so strange that the prophets and the beloved apostle struggled to even describe them coupled with the fact that he put thousands of diverse species of both plant and animal on earth, that is unlikely he left the millions of planets circling billions of stars as dead rocks. However, I would not claim Biblical imprimatur on that statement. I would be presuming to know the nature of God to say with certainty that the Biblical answer is that God created life elsewhere.

Obviously, our stories are fictional and we create an imaginary truth when we write. We don't need to know that there are aliens to use them in our stories. Neither do we need to know that there are NOT aliens to posit that in a story. Indeed, many classic science-fiction writers including luminaries such as Isaac Asimov and Arthur C. Clarke wrote novels in which the only sentient beings in the universe were humans. But they also wrote stories including aliens. That's fine. It's fiction. It's make believe. It's a story. The assumptions don't matter when they are merely assumptions brought in from the "realities" of the imaginary world the author creates. However, when those assumptions are presented as being Biblical
something significant happens, particularly when the story is intended for a Christian audience. The author then says, "This is not just the reality of my story, but this is the reality of the world outside my story, and you should believe it because it comes from the Word of God. Any other belief is wrong and possibly heretical." That may not be the intent of the author, but it is certainly the message that comes through.

Many Christian theologians throughout the years have admitted of the possibilities of extraterrestrial intelligence. One of the most prominent was C.S. Lewis. In his essay, "Religion and Rocketry" written in 1958 (from The World's Last Night and other Essays) he points to the hypocrisy of the critics of Christianity. At a time when they generally denied any assumption of life in the universe outside our own planet, it was used as a proof that life had to be accidental because it was such a longshot that it only occurred once. However, when the possibility of inhabited worlds elsewhere in the universe began to be taken seriously, the argument shifted to an attack on the Christian's "belief" that he is the center of the universe. To quote Lewis:

The supposed threat is clearly directed against the doctrine of the Incarnation, the belief that God of God "for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven and was…made man." Why for us men more than others? If we find ourselves to be but one among a million races, scattered through a million spheres, how can we, without absurd arrogance, believe ourselves to have been uniquely favored. I admit that the question could become formidable.

He says, though, that it only becomes "formidable" when we know the answers to five questions:

  1. "Are there animals anywhere except on Earth?"
  2. "Supposing there were, have any of these animals what we call 'rational souls'?" By this Lewis means being sentient and possessing a spiritual awareness.
  3. "If there are species, and rational species, other than man, are any or all of them, like us, fallen." Lewis suggests that possibly the reason for the vast distances between stars and planets is to prevent the fallen creatures from corrupting the unfallen ones, and even to prevent technologically developed species from exploiting developing ones anticipating "The Prime Directive" of the Star Trek universe by a decade.
  4. "If all of then (and surely all is a long shot) or any of them have fallen, have they been denied redemption" through the passion of Christ?
  5. "If we knew that redemption by an Incarnation and Passion, had been denied to creatures in need of it – is it certain that this is the only mode of redemption that is possible?"

Lewis, of course, is responding to non-Christian critics in this essay, however some of this also applies to Christians considering the possibility of extraterrestrial life. We cannot know on the basis of scripture alone that we are alone in the universe. Again using a quotation from Lewis, "Aslan only tells one his own story." The Bible is first the story of the Jewish people and secondly that of the church. It is not even the story of the whole earth, just of it's redemption. It's like the arguments about whether women should wear make-up, kids should watch TV or families go to the movies in the 30's-60's. None of this is actually covered in scripture, but they were classed as "sins" by many churches and denominations based on interpretations of scriptures and, to be honest, the personal prejudices of the leaders of those churches.

This brings us to a crucial issue when writing. Our personal prejudices can and should affect the story. That's what makes it our individual vision of the world which we share with others. It is the writer's unique voice being heard. However, our voice should be silenced when we purport to speak for God and imply a Biblical justification for something that the Bible itself is silent about.

None of this is to say that extraterrestrial intelligence exists. Nor did I address any of the scientific evidence for or opposed to the concept. Honesty, the state of our science today compared to the vastness of the universe makes it unlikely for us to have a definitive scientific answer to this question for a very long time, if ever. I am merely addressing the assumption that the Bible indicates that we are alone in the universe, and that is not a valid assumption.

My mother passed away this year, but she had great wisdom in the things of God. She would say, "Don't put a question mark, where God put a period." I would add to that though, "Don't put a period, where God has put a question mark!"

I'll writer more about the book tomorrow. In spite of this tangential comment, I'm enjoying it.

In the meantime why not check out the comments of these other bloggers on this month's blog tour




Trish Anderson
Brandon Barr
Jim Black
Justin Boyer
Grace Bridges
Amy Browning
Jackie Castle
Valerie Comer
Karri Compton
Lisa Cromwell
CSFF Blog Tour
Gene Curtis
D. G. D. Davidson
Janey DeMeo
Merrie Destefano or Alien Dream
Jeff Draper
April Erwin
Linda Gilmore
Beth Goddard
Marcus Goodyear
Jill Hart
Katie Hart
Sherrie Hibbs
Christopher Hopper
Becca Johnson
Jason Joyner
Kait
Karen
Dawn King
Tina Kulesa
Rachel Marks
Karen McSpadden
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Eve Nielsen
John W. Otte
Lyn Perry
Deena Peterson
Rachelle
Cheryl Russel
Chawna Schroeder
Mirtika Schultz
James Somers
Steve Trower
Speculative Faith
Laura Williams
Timothy Wise